Monday, March 10, 2014

The UAW Demands a Mulligan - WSJ.com

The UAW Demands a Mulligan - WSJ.com: "The larger NLRB—and UAW—goal may be to establish a precedent that political statements opposing a union election are enough to invalidate "laboratory conditions" and thus require a revote. That would deter politicians from speaking up in the future. This is bad labor law, and it violates the First Amendment, but modern union politics is all about using government power to overrule worker choice."



'via Blog this'

No comments:

Post a Comment